Draw Insights Neighbourhood Health Intelligence Exchange ↗ NHS NENC ICB · 00P
RiDraw Insights · NNHIP Intelligence Brief · February 2026

Neighbourhood Health in
North East & North Cumbria

England's largest ICB by geography, serving 3.1 million people across some of the most deprived communities in the country. Two NNHIP Wave 1 sites are already active — and the region's health inequalities make the case for broader programme coverage.

3.1M population 2 NNHIP Wave 1 sites ICB Code: 00P Updated Feb 2026

NHS North East and North Cumbria at a Glance

Formed in July 2022 from the merger of eight former CCGs. The largest ICB in England by geography, spanning from the Scottish border to the Tees Valley, with a population facing persistent health inequalities and significantly lower healthy life expectancy than the national average.

3.1M
Registered population
Largest ICB by geography in England — Scottish border to Tees Valley
14
NHS trusts and foundation trusts
Including 10 acute/specialist, 2 mental health, 2 community/ambulance
59.4
Healthy life expectancy (years)
vs 63.1 national average — 3.7 years below England benchmark
£7.2B+
Annual system budget
Significant structural deficit — ICB deficit reported in 2024/25

A Region Defined by Health Inequalities

The North East has the lowest healthy life expectancy of any English region. Multiple local authorities — including Middlesbrough, Hartlepool, Sunderland, and South Tyneside — rank among the most deprived 10% nationally. The gap between the most and least deprived communities within the ICB footprint is stark: male life expectancy varies by over 10 years between the most affluent and most deprived neighbourhoods.

Chronic disease prevalence is significantly elevated: cardiovascular disease, COPD, diabetes, and mental health conditions all exceed national averages. The region also has higher rates of smoking, obesity, and alcohol-related harm — the wider determinants that neighbourhood health programmes are designed to address.

Why this matters for NNHIP: The North East's health profile represents exactly the kind of population that neighbourhood health is designed to serve — high deprivation, high chronic disease burden, and a system under significant financial pressure that cannot rely on acute capacity alone.

Two Wave 1 Sites in the NENC Footprint

Stockton and Sunderland were both selected in the September 2025 Wave 1 cohort. Both sit in areas of significant deprivation and have existing integrated care foundations to build from.

Stockton-on-Tees

One of the most deprived boroughs in England with stark intra-area inequality. Central Stockton wards rank in the bottom 5% nationally for multiple deprivation. Strong existing partnership between the borough council and NHS providers, with a history of place-based health initiatives.

NNHIP Wave 1

Sunderland

Long-established All Together Better (ATB) integrated care partnership — one of the most mature vanguard models in the country. Population of 277,000 with significant health inequalities. The existing infrastructure provides a strong foundation for NNHIP delivery.

NNHIP Wave 1
Area NNHIP Status Population Key Challenge
Stockton-on-Tees Wave 1 197,000 Bottom 5% deprivation in central wards. Cardiovascular mortality significantly above average
Sunderland Wave 1 277,000 ATB integrated model established. Scaling from vanguard to neighbourhood level
Middlesbrough No Programme 141,000 Most deprived LA in England (IMD 2019). Male life expectancy 12 years below least deprived areas
Hartlepool No Programme 94,000 Among most deprived 10% nationally. High chronic disease burden, workforce challenges
South Tyneside No Programme 151,000 Significant health inequalities, aging population, high emergency demand
Gateshead No Programme 202,000 Strong VCSE infrastructure. Potential for community-led neighbourhood approach

The gap: With only 2 of its most deprived areas in Wave 1, the NENC region has significant underrepresentation in the NNHIP programme relative to its health inequalities burden. Middlesbrough — the most deprived local authority in England — has no current neighbourhood health programme coverage.

NENC: The Deprivation and Health Profile

A region where the health data makes the case for neighbourhood-level intervention without needing interpretation. The numbers are unambiguous.

Healthy life expectancy gap vs England
-3.7 years
LSOAs in bottom 20% deprivation
~35%
Cardiovascular mortality (vs national)
Significantly above
Smoking prevalence (adults)
Above average
Under-75 preventable mortality
Highest in England

Stakeholder Landscape

Key decision-makers, influencers, and delivery partners across the NENC system.

Decision Makers
ICB Chief Executive
Sam Allen · NHS NENC ICB
Appointed 2022. Leading system integration across largest ICB geography
ICB Chair
Prof Sir Liam Donaldson · NHS NENC ICB
Former Chief Medical Officer for England. National influence on health policy
NHSE North East Regional Director
NHS England North East
Oversight of NNHIP implementation in region
Influencers
Director of Public Health (multiple LAs)
12 Local Authorities across footprint
Population health management and wider determinants leadership
Academic Health Science Network
AHSN NENC
Innovation adoption and evidence dissemination
Health and Wellbeing Boards
County Durham, Northumberland, Tees Valley
Joint strategic needs assessments informing local priorities
Delivery Partners
County Durham & Darlington NHS FT
Major acute provider
Serves multiple deprived communities across Durham and Darlington
South Tees Hospitals NHS FT
James Cook University Hospital
Major trauma centre serving Middlesbrough and Tees Valley
Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS FT
Mental health and learning disability provider
Covers entire NENC footprint — critical for integrated neighbourhood models
Enablers
North East Combined Authority
Regional devolution body
Wider determinants — employment, transport, housing, economic development
Tees Valley Combined Authority
Ben Houchen (Mayor)
Investment and regeneration across Stockton, Middlesbrough, Hartlepool
VCSE Alliance
Regional voluntary sector partnership
Community-level delivery, social prescribing, lived experience insight

Where RiDraw Adds Value in NENC

The NENC system has scale, complexity, and acute health inequalities — but only two NNHIP sites. The opportunity lies in building programme architecture that connects Wave 1 learning to the broader regional need.

Evidence Framework for Wave 1 Sites

Stockton and Sunderland need audit-ready evidence chains that demonstrate impact to the ICB board and NHSE. Our TIP methodology (Tasks, Initiatives, Proof) provides the structured framework that programme coaching alone doesn't deliver.

Immediate value

Wave 2 Case Development

Middlesbrough, Hartlepool, and South Tyneside have deprivation profiles that justify programme inclusion. We can build the evidence base, governance design, and stakeholder alignment needed for compelling Wave 2 applications.

Strategic positioning

Five Elements Place Assessment

Purpose, Place, Habitat, Environment, Organisation — applied to the NENC geography. Understanding how neighbourhood health sits within the physical estate, policy context, and governance structures that shape delivery across 12 local authorities.

Place-based design

The NENC Advantage: Existing Integration Infrastructure

Unlike many regions, the North East has a history of integrated working that predates NNHIP. Sunderland's All Together Better partnership, County Durham's integrated community services, and the wider ICS development programme all provide foundations that neighbourhood health can build on rather than create from scratch.

The challenge is not the absence of partnership — it's the absence of structured programme architecture that turns partnership intent into measurable, auditable neighbourhood-level outcomes. That's the specific gap where RiDraw's cross-sector methodology applies.

The strategic case: NENC's ICB Chair (Prof Sir Liam Donaldson, former CMO) brings national credibility. The region's deprivation profile makes it a priority for neighbourhood health expansion. And the existing integration foundations mean the work starts from partnership, not from scratch. The missing piece is the evidence and programme discipline that connects these assets to demonstrable outcomes.

How We Support Neighbourhood Health Delivery

RiDraw works with NHS and public service systems on transformation challenges where multiple organisations must align around shared outcomes without shared governance.

Tasks · Initiatives · Proof

Every neighbourhood health programme needs an evidence chain that satisfies ICB boards, NHSE, and the national taskforce. Our TIP framework structures work into clear tasks with defined initiatives and auditable proof.

Evidence discipline

Multi-Stakeholder Alignment

Neighbourhood teams bring together hospital doctors, GPs, community nurses, social care, pharmacy, VCSE, and councils — without a single point of authority. We map influence, identify blockers, and design governance that works.

Governance & relationships

Five Elements Assessment

Purpose, Place, Habitat, Environment, Organisation — understanding how neighbourhood health sits within the physical and institutional landscape. Directly relevant to NNHIP estates enabler group and wider determinants.

Place-based design

Ready to explore what this means for NENC?

A 30-minute conversation to share what we're learning across NNHIP sites and explore how it applies to the North East and North Cumbria.

Start a Conversation
RiDraw · info@ridraw.com

Build Neighbourhood Health Evidence

RiDraw Exchange turns programme intelligence into structured, shareable evidence. Create exchanges that prove what NENC is delivering.

Start Creating →
Create & Share
Exchange
Prove it. Share it. Act on it.
Read
Insights
Operational intelligence
Services
RiDraw
We listen. We see. We draw.